How to Make the Best of Life: A Visionary Victorian Recipe for Enduring Actualization

“Life is like taking part in a violin solo in public and studying the instrument as one goes on.”

How to Make the Best of Life: A Visionary Victorian Recipe for Enduring Actualization

Even when we acknowledge the statistical-existential indisputable fact that demise is an emblem of our luckiness, most residing beings are emphatically averse to the thought of dying. Because the daybreak of our species, in our poems and our psalms and our desires of everlasting life, we people have been petitioning entropy for mercy, for exception, for a felicitous violation of the legal guidelines of physics. In prior ages, this was the duty of faith, and it was a vital activity — all main religions arose at a time when most youngsters by no means survived childhood, most individuals had misplaced a panoply of fogeys, youngsters, siblings, and spouses by the top of their twenties, and most by no means lived previous their forties. Folks wanted a lovely comfort simply to reside with such staggering ranges of loss, they usually discovered it within the soothing notion of an immortal soul that survives the physique. In our personal epoch, secular notions like cryogenics, transhumanism, and technological singularity have taken on that position, making an attempt to get to immortality by means of the wormhole of some very slippery semi-science.

However what if the important thing to immortality was already ours, hidden within the very coronary heart of our humanity, not in our science however in our artwork? So argues the Victorian visionary Samuel Butler (December 4, 1835–June 18, 1902) — a author of unusual foresight into our frequent future, epochs forward of his time in his pondering, and nonetheless forward of ours — in a lecture he delivered below the transient “How you can Make the Better of Life.”

Samuel Butler

Butler begins by going through the magnitude of the query:

Life is like taking part in a violin solo in public and studying the instrument as one goes on. One can’t make the most effective of such impossibilities, and the query is doubly fatuous till we’re advised which of our two lives — the aware or the unconscious — is held by the asker to be the more true life.

In a sentiment Richard Dawkins would come to echo two human lifetimes later, Butler provides:

I don’t deny that we had moderately not die, nor do I faux that a lot even within the case of probably the most favoured few can survive them past the grave. It is just as a result of that is in order that our personal life is feasible; others have made room for us, and we must always make room for others in our flip with out undue repining.

Artwork by Dorothy Lathrop, 1922. (Accessible as a print and as stationery playing cards.)

However then he presents a wondrous perspective on our eager for immortality, each counterintuitive and grounded in probably the most elementary fact of life, which is our artistic conscience:

Dying offers a life to some women and men in contrast with which their so-called existence right here is as nothing. Which is the more true lifetime of Shakespeare, Handel, that divine girl who wrote the Odyssey, and of Jane Austen — the life which palpitated with smart heat movement inside their very own our bodies, or that in advantage of which they’re nonetheless palpitating in ours? In whose consciousness does their truest life consist — their very own, or ours? Can Shakespeare be stated to have begun his true life until 100 years or so after he was lifeless and buried? His bodily life was however as an embryonic stage, a arising out of darkness, a twilight and daybreak earlier than the dawn of that lifetime of the world to come back which he was to take pleasure in hereafter.


Homer and Shakespeare converse to us most likely much more effectually than they did to the lads of their very own time, and most certainly we have now them at their greatest.

Contemplating what determines whether or not an individual is making “the most effective of life” on this approach — whether or not they’re residing as much as their highest human potential, which ensures they go on residing in different lives — Butler locates among the key in “within the wideness of his or her sympathy with, and subsequently life in and communion with different folks.” We’re in a position to acknowledge such eternal lives “within the wreckage that comes ashore from the ocean of time” — however they aren’t at all times those that reached greatness in their very own lifetime, or these worshipped by the best variety of posterity:

I don’t converse of the Virgils and Alexander Popes, and who can say what number of extra whose names I dare not point out for concern of offending. They’re as stuffed birds or beasts in a museum; serviceable little question from a scientific standpoint, however with no vivid or vivifying maintain upon us. They appear to be alive, however usually are not. I’m talking of those that do truly reside in us, and transfer us to increased achievements although they be lengthy lifeless, whose life thrusts out our personal and overrides it. I converse of those that draw us ever extra in the direction of them from youth to age, and to consider whom is to really feel without delay that we’re within the fingers of these we love, and whom we might most want to resemble.

Jacob’s Dream by William Blake, 1805. (Accessible as a print and as stationery playing cards.)

If we’re attentive sufficient to our internal lives, we are able to every acknowledge the influential lifeless residing inside us, whose life’s work has formed and is shaping our personal. (Figuring most dominantly in my very own non-public retinue are Rachel Carson, Walt Whitman, James Baldwin, Hannah Arendt, Virginia Woolf, Lewis Thomas, Carl Sagan, and Rilke.) Those that attain such immortality, Butler intimates, are passionate lovers of life, enamored with all of the dazzlements of nature and human nature:

We by no means love the reminiscence of anybody except we really feel that she or he was himself or herself a lover.


Folks stamp themselves on their work; in the event that they haven’t completed so they’re naught, if they’ve we have now them; and for probably the most half they stamp themselves deeper on their work than on their discuss. Little doubt Shakespeare and Handel will probably be in the future clear forgotten, as if they’d by no means been born. The world will ultimately die; mortality subsequently itself is just not immortal, and when demise dies the life of those males will die with it — however not sooner. It’s sufficient that they need to reside inside us and transfer us for a lot of ages as they’ve and can. Such immortality, subsequently, as some women and men are born to attain, or have thrust upon them, is a sensible if not a technical immortality, and he who would have extra let him don’t have anything… She or he who has made the most effective of the life after demise has made the most effective of the life earlier than it.

With an eye fixed to the imperceptible means by which we come to reside in others, as others have come to reside in us, he writes:

Unconsciousness isn’t any bar to livingness. Our aware actions are a drop within the sea as in contrast with our unconscious ones. Might we all know all of the life that’s in us by means of circulation, diet, respiratory, waste and restore, we must always study what an infinitesimally small half consciousness performs in our current existence; but our unconscious life is as actually life as our aware life, and although it’s unconscious to itself it emerges into an oblique and vicarious consciousness in our different and aware self, which exists however in advantage of our unconscious self. So we have now additionally a vicarious consciousness in others. The unconscious lifetime of those who have gone earlier than us has in nice half moulded us into such women and men as we’re, and our personal unconscious lives will in like method have a vicarious consciousness in others, although we be lifeless sufficient to it in ourselves.

The Dove No. 1 by Hilma af Klint, 1915. (Accessible as a print and as stationery playing cards.)

It’s by the drive of our artistic vitality, and by the generosity of spirit with which we share it with others, that we attain such immortality within the consciousness of others. Recognizing this as he seems to be over the panorama of his personal artistic subject — the artwork of literature — Butler arrives at a standard fact for all artwork:

Will [any artist] hesitate to confess that it’s a energetic pleasure to her to really feel that on the opposite aspect of the world somebody could also be smiling fortunately over her work, and that she is thus residing in that particular person although she is aware of nothing about it? Right here it appears to me that true religion is available in. Religion doesn’t consist, because the Sunday Faculty pupil stated, “within the energy of believing that which we all know to be unfaithful.” It consists in holding quick that which the healthiest and most kindly instincts of the most effective and top women and men are intuitively possessed of, with out caring to require a lot proof additional than the truth that such individuals are so satisfied; and for my very own half I discover the most effective women and men I do know unanimous in feeling that life in others, though we all know nothing about it, is however a factor to be desired and gratefully accepted if we are able to get it both earlier than demise or after… Our life then on this world is, to pure faith as a lot as to revealed, a interval of probation. The use we make of it’s to settle how far we’re to enter into one other.

In a stunning sentiment that may have despatched Vonnegut right into a vigorous nod, he considers the kind of one that most readily reaches such immortality in others:

Because the lifetime of the race is bigger, longer, and in all respects extra to be thought of than that of the person, so is the life we reside in others bigger and extra essential than the one we reside in ourselves. This seems nowhere maybe extra plainly than within the case of nice academics, who typically within the lives of their pupils produce an impact that reaches far past something produced whereas their single lives have been but unsupplemented by these different lives into which they infused their very own.

Complement with the poetic physicist Alan Lightman on slaking our craving for everlasting life and Lisel Mueller’s splendid poem “Immortality,” then revisit Butler’s prophetic admonition for the best way to save ourselves within the age of synthetic intelligence.

donating = loving

For a decade and half, I’ve been spending a whole bunch of hours and 1000’s of {dollars} every month composing The Marginalian (which bore the insufferable title Mind Pickings for its first fifteen years). It has remained free and ad-free and alive due to patronage from readers. I’ve no workers, no interns, no assistant — a completely one-woman labor of affection that can also be my life and my livelihood. If this labor makes your individual life extra livable in any approach, please contemplate lending a serving to hand with a donation. Your assist makes all of the distinction.


The Marginalian has a free weekly publication. It comes out on Sundays and presents the week’s most inspiring studying. Right here’s what to anticipate. Like? Enroll.

Related Posts